Electronic Mediated Communications
The purpose of this memo is to for
me to examine how to better evaluate customer emails, instant messages and
social media interactions (Facebook, Instagram and Twitter) and my reactions to
them. For the last 7 years I have worked
as the online communication liaison for a small doll company and am the
moderator of several Facebook selling and social groups, as well I also have a full
time job as an IT Support Specialist.
The majority of my interaction with customers, group members and clients
is via electronic mediated communication.
Text can be horribly ambiguous, and as such I have had to work very hard
to understand what my customers may or not be saying in their message from
their writing alone and be very aware of what my outgoing messages may
convey. Non-visual cues in writing are
vital to my day to day work, and being almost hyper aware to these cues has
become a huge part of my communication tool box. I have also had to work very hard at learning
how to take a step back and evaluate my perception barriers, especially the IT
Support tendency to stereotype their clients as being technology ignorant. I have, over the years in my current role
contracting to Alberta Health Services, built a rapport with clients that has
assisted me in being more other-oriented in my communications, but still feel
it is a constant work in progress.
I work daily with electronic mediated
communication with the many virtual hats I wear. Email, various forms of instant messengers,
Twitter, Instagram and Facebook all are part of my daily communications. Having worked in the professional IT sector
for over 15 years, it took me a long time to adjust to the less formal
communication style on social media.
Even though I once was a member of several electronic bulletin board
system message board systems, an early digital pre-cursor to the social media
hubs of Facebook, Reddit and Twitter, I still was very formal with my
language. I was an avid English
Literature student and my first years of post-secondary education were towards
an English degree. Throw in a very
British cultural upbringing and you have someone who takes the written word
very seriously. Now imagine my reaction
to messages like this, “I seen your current doll upload and I on accident
purchased 2 dolls is that aloud.” Or
for a buy and sell group I administer, “Y WZ MY AD DELETED?!” With these messages I have to take a step
back and shelve my unfortunate tendency to stereo type them as
unintelligent. I am ashamed to say when
first working within the confines of social media I did correct people by using
all of their misspelled words in my reply spelled correctly, or pointing out
that they were shouting in the case of the second message. It was, of course the worst way of dealing
with things, and
was even ruder than the person
shouting at me. While I had occasional
issues in my day to day work with IT clients, I was frequently commended on my
manners and my clear and easy to follow instructions to my clients in my
emails. It came to a head when a
customer of the doll company called me on it, “You know you come across as
hugely judgmental when you answer my messages.”
I was horrified. I had felt I was educating, but really I was
trying to impose my idea of how we should be communicating on customers and
group members, rather than adjusting myself to each situation. I stopped reading the messages I received via
social media as casual and began handling it as I should have from the very
start, as serious as any dealing I would have in a corporate environment. That is not to say my communications were
extremely formal but I began to examine the messages more closely and looked
past the often bad spelling or informal short hand, for the message the person
was trying to convey. I still respond
more formally than most on social media, but I am much softer in my approach
and I work very hard to use clarifying questions to try and eliminate issues.
Even before taking this course
and reading the words of Osmo Wiio, I have always found if a message can be
read more than one way, it most definitely will be the more negative
interpretation that the person receiving the message decides to pick. As such, I always read every digital
communication I get at least three times, before responding, because often
clients are frustrated by the time they have reached me at third level support
and if I am really unsure about what I’m reading I get a colleague or friend to
be a second set of eyes. The majority
of the time, I am able to respond with clarifying questions or an answer with a
request that the sender confirms I have addressed their query or needs
correctly. In the case of my role
supporting email at Alberta Health Services, if the initial communication from
the client is something I cannot successfully understand and I feel an email
will just muddy the waters I will pick up the phone. Often when I get a trouble ticket, the original
words of the client have gone through people, and I get a message that has
nothing to do with the original problem at all.
This is when I must be at my most empathetic to the client as I yet
again ask them to describe their problem and offer them my sincerest apologies
without denigrating the lower level service teams for not asking the correct
clarifying questions from the outset.
Yes, I agree language is changing and will continue to I am interested to see how far emojis
ReplyDeletewill go and if we will are evolving into a picto culture.